<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Caramel Whistle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://caramelwhistle.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://caramelwhistle.com</link>
	<description>Scout, Design, Film, and Thought Provoking stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:46:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Mike version 2.7 by KT</title>
		<link>http://caramelwhistle.com/2010/03/09/mike-version-2-7/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>KT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caramelwhistle.com/?p=862#comment-248</guid>
		<description>youre lucky 33% of the time thats more than some! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>youre lucky 33% of the time thats more than some! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making the Aberystwyth SSAGO Website by Randal</title>
		<link>http://caramelwhistle.com/2009/12/21/making-the-aberystwyth-ssago-website/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Randal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caramelwhistle.com/?p=729#comment-266</guid>
		<description>This is the reason I like caramelwhistle.com. Great opst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the reason I like caramelwhistle.com. Great opst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mike version 2.7 by Sarah</title>
		<link>http://caramelwhistle.com/2010/03/09/mike-version-2-7/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caramelwhistle.com/?p=862#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Love it, this is genius!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it, this is genius!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mike version 2.7 by Colin</title>
		<link>http://caramelwhistle.com/2010/03/09/mike-version-2-7/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caramelwhistle.com/?p=862#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Ha ha, very funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha, very funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oscar the Snowdog by Becky_Alexander</title>
		<link>http://caramelwhistle.com/2010/02/19/oscar-the-snowdog/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky_Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caramelwhistle.com/?p=836#comment-226</guid>
		<description>The word cute doesn&#039;t even cover it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word cute doesn&#8217;t even cover it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seriously, when does the new decade start? (Was there a year zero?) by Sarah</title>
		<link>http://caramelwhistle.com/2009/12/31/when-does-the-new-decade-start-was-there-a-year-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caramelwhistle.com/?p=751#comment-225</guid>
		<description>ooops I&#039;ve just spotted a lot of typing errors.... 

first: &quot;...removing things rather than counting&quot;

second: &quot;...second decade 11 to 20 etc,&quot;

corrections made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooops I&#8217;ve just spotted a lot of typing errors&#8230;. </p>
<p>first: &#8220;&#8230;removing things rather than counting&#8221;</p>
<p>second: &#8220;&#8230;second decade 11 to 20 etc,&#8221;</p>
<p>corrections made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seriously, when does the new decade start? (Was there a year zero?) by Sarah</title>
		<link>http://caramelwhistle.com/2009/12/31/when-does-the-new-decade-start-was-there-a-year-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caramelwhistle.com/?p=751#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Just seen this.... Mathematically both answers are correct. Zero is a non-number, it both exists and doesn&#039;t in mathematics. It is a value that is used in calculations and so can be used in a decade calculation but it also doesn&#039;t exist. 

When counting you don&#039;t count zero, as there isn&#039;t anything to count. You only really use zero when you are removing things rather that counting. &quot;I had one now I have zero&quot; works better than, &quot;I had zero now I have one&quot;. 

So, although technically the first decade would be 1 to 10 and second decade 11 to 10 etc, it is easier to call the decade at the 10, 20, 30 year mark as visually it is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just seen this&#8230;. Mathematically both answers are correct. Zero is a non-number, it both exists and doesn&#8217;t in mathematics. It is a value that is used in calculations and so can be used in a decade calculation but it also doesn&#8217;t exist. </p>
<p>When counting you don&#8217;t count zero, as there isn&#8217;t anything to count. You only really use zero when you are removing things rather that counting. &#8220;I had one now I have zero&#8221; works better than, &#8220;I had zero now I have one&#8221;. </p>
<p>So, although technically the first decade would be 1 to 10 and second decade 11 to 10 etc, it is easier to call the decade at the 10, 20, 30 year mark as visually it is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seriously, when does the new decade start? (Was there a year zero?) by Simon Jerram</title>
		<link>http://caramelwhistle.com/2009/12/31/when-does-the-new-decade-start-was-there-a-year-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Jerram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caramelwhistle.com/?p=751#comment-223</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d go with the 1st decade being 9 years long. A decade isn&#039;t as formal an era as a century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d go with the 1st decade being 9 years long. A decade isn&#8217;t as formal an era as a century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Film Review: Blindness (2008) by loopylove</title>
		<link>http://caramelwhistle.com/2009/10/04/film-review-blindness-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>loopylove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caramelwhistle.com/?p=658#comment-222</guid>
		<description>That was a very interesting post, I enjoyed reading it. You are so right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a very interesting post, I enjoyed reading it. You are so right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gang Show Rehearsal 19-01-10 by Rosie</title>
		<link>http://caramelwhistle.com/2010/01/19/gang-show-rehearsal-19-01-10/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caramelwhistle.com/?p=784#comment-220</guid>
		<description>tasted good too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tasted good too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
