In an unprecedented move Skadi, the Snowshoe, the Norse Goddess of Winter (and Hunting) has laid down 12cm (5 inches) of snow in the area, in particular about 15cm (8 inches) on my car. This has resulted in me having all my Work done for my Job today but not being able, or needed, to go in for more. So I’ve started the day doing all the little itty bitty tasks that could be done any time but more important things take president. This Snow day is extra or bonus time, which means that I can get my holey cow ideas done without negating anything else. As such I’ve published a Bucket List which I’m going to update from time to time when I achieve something, and quite likely post about it too!
I’m sure you’ve all kept yourselves amused as well today and I’d be interested to know how you’ve made use of your time.
Heres the article from BBC News covering todays weather
One of my favourite films is the 1960 classic (H.G. Wells’) The Time Machine. A 19th Century Scientist builds a Time Machine and travels forwards in time to see the progress of Humanity. Witnessing the destruction in World War II he travels further eventually seeing the 803rd Century and a Utopian society of gentle humans. But all is not as ideal as it seems.
The end of the film, without giving away any spoilers, he comes back to his present collects 3 books and returns to the future. If you were going to rebuild civilization what 3 books would you take?
Pre-determination implies there is a plan for the Universe, a fixed route to get from the past to the future. In this type of Universe no accidents occur because they were all suposed to happen and although we think we are making choices we’re not, we’re just conforming to the plan.
In The Matrix amongst all the protagonist’s abilities he had the ability of foresight, this gift was only for events within the matrix and its machinery but not the real world. How does this apply to us?
In an enclosed environment if you know everything that effects an object and you know all the objects in an environment then you can predict the outcome. In an imaginary frictionless box you place a ball and give it a nudge the ball will bounce around and keep doing so. You can predict the bounces if you know what angle the ball was nudged at and thus route the path before it happens. Adding another ball just means that it’s more complicated, both paths have to be plot to the same duration and when they bounce the directions calculated. Its harder work but it is possible with enough time and thought.
The Matrix was a realtime occurring environment, so more events were occurring every second, but agents and thus the Matrix itself have limits so if you’ve got a faster processor (such as your brain) then you can run the same events faster and find the outcome sooner. However there are limitations in the Matrix and in the real world.
No-one can see beyond a choice they don’t understand, and I mean no-one.
What The Oracle is saying that you can only have foresight if you know what choices you (and the rest of the matrix) are going to make, if you don’t know then when running the ‘foresight version’ of the Matrix then you’ll reach an impasse and not know anything further. So for someone contending with the person that has the foresight the phrase “you’ve already made the choice, now you have to understand why you’ve made it” is quite scary because they know what you are going to do and why you did before you’ve had the choice present itself and searched all your past experiences for the answer.
Having a plan for the Universe means that it is possible to know what choices people will make before they make them so it is possible for us mortals to see into the future.
There are 2 types of Universe we can exist in, one where we only think we are making choices and one were we are actually making choices. The one where choice is an illusion means that there could be a map or plan to the Universe, the other anything that could happen might. If the Universe has a plan then we are obviously not privy to it, if anything can happen then what are the consequences?
From our perspective every action or choice will spawn a different universe, over the space of a few seconds the changes will be negligible, but over say 100 years they could be huge, for instance if a regiment of WWII soldiers went left instead of right perhaps we might have lost the war and be in German occupied Britain.
This would mean from this second onwards the timeline would look like this:
However if someone looks back from the future then the present looks just like our past. The reason is only 1 of the paths diverging from our present ends in the future when the observer is from. So ‘if’ time travel is possible then the future boy in the present could only get back to the future where he came from if everything happens just as it did for his past.
In a pre-determined Universe no matter when you go you can always get back when you came from. Thus it is a much simpler Universe to live in however since when has the Universe been simple?
We’ll be exploring a variety of problems based on these premises in some upcoming blog posts.
Synopsis: In the future the ability to travel through time has been mastered and a new branch of the Government created to regulate the company “Time Safari” that uses this technology to travel to the Cretaceous period and take down an allosaurus 5 minutes before it dies. There are 3 rules: Don’t change anything in the past; don’t leave anything behind; and most important, don’t bring anything back…..
At the conclusion of this film I was left with thinking how unrepresentative the title of this film is, okay at a stretch you could associate the Dinosaurs foot-steps with the thunderous pound oh so brilliantly demonstrated in Jurassic Park, but as I say this is a stretch.
That being said there are many good points to this film, one of which is the post-modern environments the characters are placed in, the detail is comprehensive and the variety of extra elements such as the broad array of automobiles driving up and down the street. However when something affects the environment such as the pavement collapsing the street apparently has no depth and the illusion shattered (pun intended).
Edward Burns remains austere for the entirety of the film, perhaps its his guise for portraying the severity of the storyline or perhaps its something for more amateur… Ben Kingsley delivers a sturdy performance demonstrating that he’s always on his ‘A’ game even if the highest prospects of the film are sub-terrainian.
Reading further on this film and finds it was originally scheduled for realise in 2003 and only just made it to DVD now because the original production company went bankrupt, still you have to be amazed at the graphics quality in comparison to the big budget movies like Star Wars and The Lord of the Rings Trilogy that came out that year and they must’ve had at least 10 times the amount on CG imagery.
The premise is promising, reminiscent of Thrill Seekers, a low budget 90s film, also about the pitfalls of time travel, predictably even when rules are set by ourselves for the benefit of all humanity someone has to take a shortcut because their egomania deludes them into thinking they are above causality.
Certainly a blockbuster if a some post-production financial aid came through sooner or a some thorough dialogue adjustments made but sadly time travel doesn’t exist and we will never know. There are better films to spend your £3 rental on, ranking this one somewhere close to the top of the sucky film pile.